10-Assessment

  • Image created for the project.

    1-Type of assessment: formative and summative.

    Formative: we intend to assess the collaborative work of each student inside the international working team to improve the adquisition of competencies.

    Summative: we want to assess the products during the school year to know if the student acquired the competencies for the academic evaluation.

    2-Time for assessment: continuous assessment.

    The project has been included in the schedule of several subjects at different educational levels (Classical languages and ICT in Secondary and Post-Secondary education), therefore, it has counted both for the mark of each partial evaluation and for the final grade of each student.

    3-Scope of the assessment: students, families and teachers.

    The assessment has taken into account both the project participants and their families.

    4-Tools for the assessment: rubrics, surveys and video about students`opinion.

    4a-Rubrics:

    Project logo: Assessment rubric for the logo

    1st Product: Assessment rubric for the Classical Bestiary.

    2nd Product: Assessment rubric for the Female Monster Museum.

    3rd Product:

    Assesment rubric for Dr. Van Helsing guide.

    Assessment rubric for Dr. Van Helsing presentation.

    4b-Surveys:

    Satisfaction survey for students and commented results.

    Satisfaction survey for teachers and commented results.

    Satisfaction survey for families and commented results.

    4c-Video on students`oppinion:

    5-Project`s results:

    Here are the results obtained by the students in the final academic evaluation of the project.

    Achievement indicators: 

    Very poor: grade point average is less than 2

    Poor: grade point average is equal to or higher than 2 or less than 4

    Medium: grade point average is equal to or higher than 4 or less than 6

    High: grade point average is equal to or higher than 6 or less than 8

    Very high: grade point average is equal to or higher than 8

    Chart of project outcomes:

    The degree of achievement of the objectives in the final assessment has been highly satisfactory:

    Very High:  44.2 %

    High: 16.2 %

    Medium:  14 %

    Poor: 20.6 %

    Very poor: 5 %