Pages

A 15: Evaluation of the third students mobility.

  •  

    Where are you from?(48 responses)
    BulgariaGreeceLithuaniaPolandRomaniaSpain18.8%27.1%14.6%12.5%27.1%

     
    Bulgaria 13
    Greece 6
    Lithuania 7
    Poland 13
    Romania 0
    Spain 9
     
    LOGISTIC AND ORGANIZATION
    Practical information (accomodation, transport, schedule, …) prior to the meeting was…(48 responses)
    Poor12345Excellent01020300 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)3 (6.3%)3 (6.3%)16 (33.3%)16 (33.3%)29 (60.4%)29 (60.4%)

     

    INDEX COUNT
    1 0
    2 0
    3 3
    4 16
    5 29
     
    Accomodation suggested by the host country was…(48 responses)
    Poor12345Excellent0102030400 (0%)0 (0%)1 (2.1%)1 (2.1%)3 (6.3%)3 (6.3%)7 (14.6%)7 (14.6%)37 (77.1%)37 (77.1%)

     

    INDEX COUNT
    1 0
    2 1
    3 3
    4 7
    5 37
     
    Meals offered at the school were…(48 responses)
    Poor12345Excellent010201 (2.1%)1 (2.1%)1 (2.1%)1 (2.1%)7 (14.6%)7 (14.6%)13 (27.1%)13 (27.1%)26 (54.2%)26 (54.2%)

     

    INDEX COUNT
    1 1
    2 1
    3 7
    4 13
    5 26
     
    Help and personal assitance provided during your stay was…(48 responses)
    Poor12345Excellent01020300 (0%)0 (0%)1 (2.1%)1 (2.1%)4 (8.3%)4 (8.3%)9 (18.8%)9 (18.8%)34 (70.8%)34 (70.8%)

     

    INDEX COUNT
    1 0
    2 1
    3 4
    4 9
    5 34
     
    TRIPS
    Tuesday study trip to Murfatlar-Constanta was: (48 responses)
    Poor12345Excellent01020300 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)2 (4.2%)2 (4.2%)11 (22.9%)11 (22.9%)35 (72.9%)35 (72.9%)

     

    INDEX COUNT
    1 0
    2 0
    3 2
    4 11
    5 35
     
    Thursday study trip to Bran-Râsnov was:(48 responses)
    Poor12345Excellent01020300 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)4 (8.3%)4 (8.3%)12 (25%)12 (25%)32 (66.7%)32 (66.7%)

     

    INDEX COUNT
    1 0
    2 0
    3 4
    4 12
    5 32
     
    Meals provided on trips were…(48 responses)
    Poor12345Excellent01020300 (0%)0 (0%)1 (2.1%)1 (2.1%)3 (6.3%)3 (6.3%)12 (25%)12 (25%)32 (66.7%)32 (66.7%)

     

    INDEX COUNT
    1 0
    2 1
    3 3
    4 12
    5 32
     
    Work sessions
    Monday First Session: CLIL methodology was…(48 responses)
    Poor12345Excellent01020300 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)3 (6.3%)3 (6.3%)13 (27.1%)13 (27.1%)32 (66.7%)32 (66.7%)

     

    INDEX COUNT
    1 0
    2 0
    3 3
    4 13
    5 32
     
    Monday Second Session: Labour market researches were…(48 responses)
    Poor12345Excellent01020300 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)2 (4.2%)2 (4.2%)19 (39.6%)19 (39.6%)27 (56.3%)27 (56.3%)

     

    INDEX COUNT
    1 0
    2 0
    3 2
    4 19
    5 27
     
    Wednesday First Session: CLIL methodology was…(48 responses)
    Poor12345Excellent01020300 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)2 (4.2%)2 (4.2%)13 (27.1%)13 (27.1%)33 (68.8%)33 (68.8%)

     

    INDEX COUNT
    1 0
    2 0
    3 2
    4 13
    5 33
     
    Wednesday Second Session: Presentation of the Centre for Career Development was…(48 responses)
    Poor12345Excellent010202 (4.2%)2 (4.2%)1 (2.1%)1 (2.1%)13 (27.1%)13 (27.1%)11 (22.9%)11 (22.9%)21 (43.8%)21 (43.8%)

     

    INDEX COUNT
    1 2
    2 1
    3 13
    4 11
    5 21
     
    Wednesday Third Session: Labour market researches were…(48 responses)
    Poor12345Excellent010200 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)3 (6.3%)3 (6.3%)21 (43.8%)21 (43.8%)24 (50%)24 (50%)

     

    INDEX COUNT
    1 0
    2 0
    3 3
    4 21
    5 24
     
    Friday Second Session: CLIL methodology was…(48 responses)
    Poor12345Excellent01020300 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)4 (8.3%)4 (8.3%)14 (29.2%)14 (29.2%)30 (62.5%)30 (62.5%)

     

    INDEX COUNT
    1 0
    2 0
    3 4
    4 14
    5 30
     
    Friday Third Session: Visit to a vegetable farm was…(48 responses)
    Poor12345Excellent010201 (2.1%)1 (2.1%)2 (4.2%)2 (4.2%)7 (14.6%)7 (14.6%)14 (29.2%)14 (29.2%)24 (50%)24 (50%)

     

    INDEX COUNT
    1 1
    2 2
    3 7
    4 14
    5 24
     
    MEETING OUTCOME AND FURTHER COMMENTS
    Did the meeting fulfill your expectations?(48 responses)
    ..12345..01020300 (0%)0 (0%)1 (2.1%)1 (2.1%)2 (4.2%)2 (4.2%)12 (25%)12 (25%)33 (68.8%)33 (68.8%)

     

    INDEX COUNT
    1 0
    2 1
    3 2
    4 12
    5 33
     
    Did the meeting provide useful information to carry out the project at your school?(48 responses)
    ..12345..01020301 (2.1%)1 (2.1%)0 (0%)0 (0%)2 (4.2%)2 (4.2%)15 (31.3%)15 (31.3%)30 (62.5%)30 (62.5%)

     

    INDEX COUNT
    1 1
    2 0
    3 2
    4 15
    5 30
     
    Do you think you contributed to the development and success of this meeting?(48 responses)
    ..12345..01020300 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)1 (2.1%)1 (2.1%)18 (37.5%)18 (37.5%)29 (60.4%)29 (60.4%)

     

    INDEX COUNT
    1 0
    2 0
    3 1
    4 18
    5 29
     
    Was the meeting useful to get to know and establish good relationships among partners?(48 responses)
    Not at all12345Yes, a lot020400 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)9 (18.8%)9 (18.8%)39 (81.3%)39 (81.3%)

     

    INDEX COUNT
    1 0
    2 0
    3 0
    4 9
    5 39
     
    The temporal organisation of the sessions was…(48 responses)
    Bad12345Excellent010200 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)4 (8.3%)4 (8.3%)20 (41.7%)20 (41.7%)24 (50%)24 (50%)

     

    INDEX COUNT
    1 0
    2 0
    3 4
    4 20
    5 24
     

    Dissemination activity in Regional Business Incubator

    On the 9th of March we had a chance to present our project and promote it. It happened during the “Business lunch” provided by Regional Business Incubator in Łuków.

     

    Student’s blogs

     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Piotr’s Rzymowski blog